Thursday, September 8, 2016

North Carolina and the Importance of a Ground Game

This week we preview North Carolina. North Carolina was the state Romney won in 2012 that came closest to falling into Democratic hands and one that Democrats are targeting forcefully this year. North Carolina also has some interesting attributes. It is one of only eight states in which President Obama actually received more votes in 2012 than he did in 2008. The importance of this is that it likely means that not very many voters flipped from Obama to Romney but instead Romney was able to turnout more of his voters. So each candidate’s ground game may make the difference here. 

In 2008, John McCain lacked the resources to defend the state. McCain didn’t make it a priority because if it fell it was nearly certain he had already lost. By contrast, Barack Obama worked the state exceptionally hard, winning it by 14,000 votes. In 2012, Romney knew he had to win and found his way to a 92,000 victory fueled by more voters.  

And not much has changed. Digging into the county-by-county data, the story of North Carolina is one of consistency. In 2012, Obama basically ran about two points worse per county that he did statewide in 2008. There were a few small exceptions where Obama did a little better and there were a few places he did worse but basically there are not that many minds to change in the state. Campaigns are thus just an effort to bring your voters to the polls.  

North Carolina’s transformation from being a state Democrats lost in 2000 and 2004 by 13 and 12 points respectively to a swing state has come about due to changes in its largest counties. Six of them went from being close counties in 2000 to being Obama strongholds in 2012. Mecklenburg (Charlotte), Wake (Raleigh), Guilford (Greensboro), Forsyth (Winston Salem), Cumberland (Fayetteville), and Buncombe (Asheville) joined Durham as strong Democratic counties but even it got much more so.

The incredible improvements by Democrats in this region come from an influx of Northern transplants. The same in migration ended up moving Northern Virginia into a Democratic stronghold. Democrats have lost ground in western and eastern North Carolina, particularly in the far south and north east, but in the middle of the state with the large population centers Democratic gains have more than offset losses elsewhere. Even in the counties where Democrats are losing ground, the declines can only be so big because the African American population gives Democrats a decent-sized floor.

What this means overall is that North Carolina is the kind of state that is very likely to be decided by a close enough margin that the campaigns’ ground games will matter a great deal.  We are already starting to see some evidence of this. More than half of all new registrants come from the biggest Obama counties (four of the seven mentioned above plus Orange where the University of North Carolina is located) although those counties represent just 31% of all voters. (Dave Wasserman at Cook Political report supplied this information.) North Carolina is exactly the sort of state where Democratic GOTV efforts might just be enough to edge it in Clinton’s direction.

A very large percentage of North Carolina’s vote is cast early and lots of data from its early vote is reported, thus providing an earlier indication of how things are shaping up than most states.

Although North Carolina is not normally essential to getting a Democrat to 270, it can be a source of stress for the Republicans. It’s rather late in the election season for the state still to be on the board. Obama mostly gave up here in 2012, while keeping the pressure on. After the convention in Charlotte, he did not set foot in the state again. Hillary Clinton was there today. 

North Carolina is trending Democratic. Romney won the state but his improvement in the state over McCain in 2008 was less that his marginal improvement nationwide. It may be the Democratic trend plus the get-out-of-the vote work will be enough for Clinton to win here. 






Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

The Scorecard

The Scorecard

The Scorecard is a political strategy and analysis blog. Our hope is to provide information and insight that can be found nowhere else into how and why things are happening in American politics. Unlike many political pundits, we will tell you who we think is going to win as an election approaches; we will tell you why; and we will give you a sense of our level of confidence. Ours is a holistic approach, one that takes in as many numbers as possible but is also willing to look past the numbers if need be. When we turn out to have been wrong, we will let you know. When we are right, we’ll let you know that too.

Our Delegate Math


Delegate Count


Delegate Contests

About Me

Delegate Count

Author Jason Paul is a longtime political operative who got his start as an intern in 2002. He has been a political forecaster for almost as long. He won the 2006 Swing State Project election prediction contest and has won two other local contests. He had the pulse of Obama-Clinton race in 2008 and has been as good as anyone at delegate math in the 2016 race. He looks forwards to providing quality coverage for the remainder of the 2016 race.