Thursday, July 14, 2016

Time to Take a Look at the Electoral College

The premier data journalism blog, www.fivethiryeight.com, gets its name from the total number of electoral votes. We cannot ignore that tradition. To gain a majority and win the White House, you need to get 270 Electoral College votes. In trying to figure out how a candidate will get to that number, there’s a tendency to focus on big swing states rather than the tipping point states. We don’t think that’s the best approach. We prefer to start with the combination of states that enabled the winner to win in the most recent election.

There were six states that were key to Barack Obama’s getting to 272 in the 2012 selection. (Obama won an additional three states to end on 332 but he did not need them.) Obama’s smallest margin of victory came in Colorado. The margin in Pennsylvania was a very close second. The next four closest states that Obama relied upon for his majority were New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada and Wisconsin. The state that Obama carried next was Virginia, which was extra. Notice this list does not include Florida or Ohio. Florida and Ohio are very important to the Republicans; it is absolutely essential that they win them both. Democrats have a Virginia-based path and an even easier path to win without them.

 We have polling that moves the Obama order around a bit. Colorado seems to moving very far out of Trump’s range as three polls put the average margin at 10 points. Trump also seems to be slipping in Virginia. The most recent poll has Clinton plus 7, nearly doubling the margin from 2012.

The places where Trump may be closer than in 2012 are Iowa, New Hampshire and perhaps Wisconsin. Trump absolutely needs two out of three of these to win if he loses Virginia. (Amazingly, such an outcome results in a tie that would throw the election into the House of Representatives whose members can select whomever they want to be President; they would be unlikely to pick Trump.)

 Watching these seven states seems to us to be the best way to think about the Electoral College. If you have to pick another state to follow, it is Florida because Trump would find it very hard to win without it. 

This is how the Electoral College math works and will continue to work as we go forward. 
 
Share:

1 comment:

  1. The Electoral College system could change dramatically for 2020.

    The National Popular Vote bill could guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country.

    Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in every presidential election. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps of pre-determined outcomes. There would no longer be a handful of 'battleground' states (where the two major political parties happen to have similar levels of support among voters) where voters and policies are more important than those of the voters in 38+ predictable states that have just been 'spectators' and ignored after the conventions.

    The bill would take effect when enacted by states with a majority of the electoral votes—270 of 538.
    All of the presidential electors from the enacting states will be supporters of the presidential candidate receiving the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC)—thereby guaranteeing that candidate with an Electoral College majority.

    The bill has passed 34 state legislative chambers in 23 rural, small, medium, large, red, blue, and purple states with 261 electoral votes. The bill has been enacted by 11 small, medium, and large jurisdictions with 165 electoral votes – 61% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.

    NationalPopularVote

    ReplyDelete

The Scorecard

The Scorecard

The Scorecard is a political strategy and analysis blog. Our hope is to provide information and insight that can be found nowhere else into how and why things are happening in American politics. Unlike many political pundits, we will tell you who we think is going to win as an election approaches; we will tell you why; and we will give you a sense of our level of confidence. Ours is a holistic approach, one that takes in as many numbers as possible but is also willing to look past the numbers if need be. When we turn out to have been wrong, we will let you know. When we are right, we’ll let you know that too.

Our Delegate Math


Delegate Count


Delegate Contests

About Me

Delegate Count

Author Jason Paul is a longtime political operative who got his start as an intern in 2002. He has been a political forecaster for almost as long. He won the 2006 Swing State Project election prediction contest and has won two other local contests. He had the pulse of Obama-Clinton race in 2008 and has been as good as anyone at delegate math in the 2016 race. He looks forwards to providing quality coverage for the remainder of the 2016 race.