Thursday, May 12, 2016

No Place to Hide: The Republican Trump Dilemma

The challenge Donald Trump poses to the Republican Party is enormous, and the last day of competitive races proved it. Trump won a crucial victory in Indiana, but he also faced a furious Ted Cruz swinging for his head in a spectacular manner that is difficult to walk back. The fight alone presents problems for Republicans because elections in America have become team sports.  People choose a side and stick with it. Yes, there are some crossover voters who back a Democrat for President and Republican for Congress but in the 2012 election there were only 26 ticket splitting district, about 6% of the overall total. The end of ticket splitting combined with the splitting of the Republican Party is a risky business for all Republicans on the 2016 ballot.

The Republican Party can be divided into five relatively equal pieces in terms of their attitude toward the presumptive nominee.

Twenty percent of the Republican electorate is hardcore, super excited, go Trump people. They go to rallies, they make noise, they love Trump and, if crossed, they will create a problem.

Another 20% are simply Trump voters. They like him, they decided he was the best choice but they can blend back into being ordinary Republicans relatively quickly.

Another 20% didn’t vote for Trump or did so but only late in the process and somewhat reluctantly. They are inclined to vote for him in the general election but can be susceptible to new, negative information.

Another 20% opposed Trump, some proudly, but they are Republicans and so in the end they will likely come around.

Another 20% seem implacably opposed to Trump. The list of those who announced they won’t vote for Trump is long and may get longer, including the most recent Republican nominee, Mitt Romney. 
The problem for Team Red is that it needs 90% of all Republicans, whatever Trump group they fall in, to vote for its down ballot candidates. Otherwise Republican incumbents in a remotely marginal seat with an even half way decent challenger will lose.

This is where the risk comes. Even if the entire 60% in the middle will vote for Republican candidates no matter what, the 20% of voters on either extreme are a risk for defection regardless of what a candidate chooses to do. Hardcore Trump people may not want to vote for any mainstream Republican for fear that person is plotting against Trump. ` Never Trump’ may want to punish any Republican who stands by the Donald as means of discouraging Republicans from doing so. No matter what candidates choose to do they risk alienating 20% of their base. But if they try and hide, they risk alienating 40% of their base as both Trump lovers and haters don’t know where they stand. 
In addition, the ranks of the Trump lovers and haters could expand should things get even more acrimonious. Earlier today Paul Ryan met with Trump without anything being resolved, after Ryan suggested he wasn’t quite ready to be on board with Trump. That was enough to prompt Sean Hannity to say he wants a new Speaker.
Dissension and division spill out everywhere and no one knows whom to trust or what policy agenda will be set. Does voting for a House Republican mean building a wall and a crackdown on trade, or comprehensive immigration reform and free trade?
If this squabbling leads the average Republican candidate to get just 80% of the traditional Republican vote then the party could end up in huge trouble. It’s hard to know how to solve this problem, which doesn’t get much easier even if Trump’s performance improves to 47% of the electorate.  

This might be why Republicans are meeting and trying and hoping to get on the same page, but it still could all be for naught. 
Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

The Scorecard

The Scorecard

The Scorecard is a political strategy and analysis blog. Our hope is to provide information and insight that can be found nowhere else into how and why things are happening in American politics. Unlike many political pundits, we will tell you who we think is going to win as an election approaches; we will tell you why; and we will give you a sense of our level of confidence. Ours is a holistic approach, one that takes in as many numbers as possible but is also willing to look past the numbers if need be. When we turn out to have been wrong, we will let you know. When we are right, we’ll let you know that too.

Our Delegate Math


Delegate Count


Delegate Contests

About Me

Delegate Count

Author Jason Paul is a longtime political operative who got his start as an intern in 2002. He has been a political forecaster for almost as long. He won the 2006 Swing State Project election prediction contest and has won two other local contests. He had the pulse of Obama-Clinton race in 2008 and has been as good as anyone at delegate math in the 2016 race. He looks forwards to providing quality coverage for the remainder of the 2016 race.