Sunday, February 7, 2016

How we think about the Republican side of the New Hampshire Primary.

The lead story in politics on the R side is clearly Marco Rubio’s struggles in last night’s Republican debate. We have been watching the polls incredibly closely. Even before the debate, we were already starting to see some signs of the fading of Marcomentum. We can’t be sure that trend will continue. During primaries, polls have to be watched particularly closely. Things move so quickly that the day the poll was taken can be important. Because of this, getting more and more recent polling can help. So we will hold off making a prediction until some time tomorrow.
One way we predict election results is to ground our thinking in past elections result and returns, and use them as the basis for everything we think.  Yes, things change so it would be incorrect to just assume that what happened in the past will happen in the future. However, it is better to start with the past and build on it rather than ignore the past altogether.
So looking at the 2012 Republican primary can be instructive. In 2012, the Republican establishment candidates took 56% of the vote with Romney getting 39% and Hunstman getting 17%. The two right-wing Christians got 18% with 9% each for Gingrich and Santorum. The stick -them-in-your-eye anti-establishment vote went to Paul at 23%. This accounts for about 98% of the vote with others taking 2%.
But the establishment vote in 2012 was likely inflated. Romney was a very strong establishment candidate against whom very little money was spent. In addition, the lack of a Democratic primary meant that unaffiliateds likely voted in the Republican primary and went for the more establishment candidates. Neither of those factors is in play this year.

As a result we predict that 50% of the vote will go to the non-establishment trio of Donald Trump, Ben Carson and Ted Cruz, while the other 50% will go to the other five candidates, Marco Rubio, John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and Carly Fiorina. Carving up the pie in these ways makes it easier to make specific predictions, which will come tomorrow. 
Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

The Scorecard

The Scorecard

The Scorecard is a political strategy and analysis blog. Our hope is to provide information and insight that can be found nowhere else into how and why things are happening in American politics. Unlike many political pundits, we will tell you who we think is going to win as an election approaches; we will tell you why; and we will give you a sense of our level of confidence. Ours is a holistic approach, one that takes in as many numbers as possible but is also willing to look past the numbers if need be. When we turn out to have been wrong, we will let you know. When we are right, we’ll let you know that too.

Our Delegate Math


Delegate Count


Delegate Contests

About Me

Delegate Count

Author Jason Paul is a longtime political operative who got his start as an intern in 2002. He has been a political forecaster for almost as long. He won the 2006 Swing State Project election prediction contest and has won two other local contests. He had the pulse of Obama-Clinton race in 2008 and has been as good as anyone at delegate math in the 2016 race. He looks forwards to providing quality coverage for the remainder of the 2016 race.

Blog Archive