This has been a week to remember in the Republican race. The
charges and counter charges, The name-calling and the accusations have reached
a fever pitch. And yet the multi-candidate field dynamics that have benefited
Trump so greatly continue almost unabated. Trump’s lead has for the most part led
the other candidates this week to stop sniping against each other, which has
helped the cause somewhat. But the reality is that rather than having a stop-Trump
strategy, every campaign continues to have a how-I- win strategy. As will be
better explained in our final Republican preview tomorrow, the Republican rules
are such that doing too well against a potential foe can have the effect of
giving support to Trump as well as to that candidate. In most cases, the way
the math works is that unless a candidate can get past Trump substantially,
extra votes don’t gain the candidate much. But if a rival misses one of the
percentage thresholds for delegates, his percentage of the vote will be split
proportionally among the remaining candidates. Other candidates will benefit
from the fallout but so does Trump.
Another interesting dynamic this week has been
the effect Marco Rubio’s attack on Trump will have on his standing. The media
is pushing the idea that this is all upside for Rubio as he is now the center
of attention. That might be right. Another school of thought, however, is that
Rubio has lowered himself to Trump’s level. Thus, it is possible that even as
Rubio takes from Trump he sends them to Cruz, He also runs the risk of pushing
undecided voters from himself to Cruz. He also could lose some votes to John
Kasich, who is pretty much alone in the civility lane. Without any real polling
in the wake of the dustups, we are left mostly flying blind.
A final note: much has been made of
the large number of endorsements that Rubio has been getting. It is worth
pointing out just how disdained some of the endorsers are. Senator Lamar
Alexander of Tennessee endorsed Rubio today. In 2014, Alexander, as a sitting
senator, had two primary challengers, who held him to under 50% of the
Republican primary vote. Although the media tends to focus on tea-party
challengers only when they win, it should be remembered that even when they
don’t win their voters still exist in the Republican primary electorate going
forward. Primary voters who opposed Alexander in 2014 are unlikely to be
impressed by his endorsement two years later. The dynamic of a more right
leaning GOP primary electorate has been missed even as it continues to define
this race.
Coming tomorrow: Democratic and Republican previews tomorrow
down to the delegate and every allocation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment