Monday, February 15, 2016

Trump. V. Bush and the Battle for Oxygen

So it is has finally come to this. After Saturday’s debate, Trump’s press conference and George W.’s campaigning, we are in a full-on slugfest between Donald Trump and Jeb Bush.
Traditionally, in multi-candidate field dynamics when two candidates are whacking away at each other it benefits the other candidates. However, it is possible that in this race there will be a different effect.
In its up and downs, and in its entire being, this campaign has been about Donald Trump. What Jeb Bush is attempting to do is make this race a referendum on Donald Trump. By bringing in George W. Bush and making it so personal, Jeb Bush is saying that those who wish to oppose Donald Trump should vote for him. He is even messaging against Rubio and Cruz, implying that their refusal to go after Trump means they are not worthy adversaries.
This strategy poses particular challenges for Marco Rubio who lacks a clear plan. Cruz has mined a lane of Christian conservatives relentlessly. Even Kasich, who is counting on doing better in other states, still has a South Carolina strategy. He’s chasing Northern transplants and those who want to rise above the muck. But Rubio lacks a clearly defined group of supporters or argument. He thus is hoping to patch together a wide swath of supporters. This is a hard strategy if the press is focused on the battle elsewhere. 
Bush and Trump clawing at each other may not help the other candidates. As things heat up, voters may be inclined to want to weigh in on the referendum question of Bush or Trump. That helps Bush, even as it also helps Trump.  

While we wait on more polling from South Carolina, these are the dynamics to consider. 
Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

The Scorecard

The Scorecard

The Scorecard is a political strategy and analysis blog. Our hope is to provide information and insight that can be found nowhere else into how and why things are happening in American politics. Unlike many political pundits, we will tell you who we think is going to win as an election approaches; we will tell you why; and we will give you a sense of our level of confidence. Ours is a holistic approach, one that takes in as many numbers as possible but is also willing to look past the numbers if need be. When we turn out to have been wrong, we will let you know. When we are right, we’ll let you know that too.

Our Delegate Math


Delegate Count


Delegate Contests

About Me

Delegate Count

Author Jason Paul is a longtime political operative who got his start as an intern in 2002. He has been a political forecaster for almost as long. He won the 2006 Swing State Project election prediction contest and has won two other local contests. He had the pulse of Obama-Clinton race in 2008 and has been as good as anyone at delegate math in the 2016 race. He looks forwards to providing quality coverage for the remainder of the 2016 race.

Blog Archive